Pages

Wednesday, December 25, 2013

ANHAM FZCO, Criminally Investigated By Pentagon for Illegally Delivering U.S. Military Supplies Through IRAN, Using American Tax Payer Dollars

Did ANHAM use American tax payer dollars to finance Iran's Revolutionary Guards (Kidnappers of Americans & Funders of World Terrorism) to delivery goods for American soldiers in Afghanistan? Worse, how is this company STILL holding the largest food contract for feeding American soldiers?

A new December 23, 2013 reports by Bloomberg cited that Pentagon’s criminal investigations arm is seriously probing one of the American military’s largest suppliers in Afghanistan over allegations that it violated U.S. law by moving supplies through Iran, the Defense Department told lawmakers. An article in The Wall Street Journal in September, which prompted the investigation, disclosed that Anham relied on the Iranian port of Bandar Abbas and on Iranian supply routes to move steel, tractors and refrigeration panels into Afghanistan to build warehouses and other logistical centers. Anham’s actions may have violated strict U.S. sanctions laws that prohibit American entities from conducting trade with Iran or Iranian companies by moving materials through the country, Obama administration officials said.

Anham made a voluntary disclosure in September to the Treasury and Commerce Departments regarding transshipments through Iran, after the company was contacted about the matter by the Journal. The logistics agency said Anham was “still in the process of providing documentation on the matter.” It added that “no changes have been made to the SPV Afghanistan contract” since the disclosure. “As Anham is still in the process of preparing their official disclosure to the Department of Commerce and Department of Treasury, any actions would be premature,” the statement read. “We will make an informed decision on next steps once we have all the facts.”



Senators Mark Kirk (R., Ill.) and Kelly Ayotte (R., N.H.) pressed the Pentagon’s Inspector General to open an investigation into Anham due to concerns the company may have directly done business with Iran’s elite military unit, the Revolutionary Guard Corps. The corps controls some of the container ports at Bandar Abbas, the U.S. Treasury says. The U.S. lawmakers asked in an October letter to the Inspector General whether Anham’s contract could be restricted or terminated and if any disciplinary action had been taken against Anham executives. “Until the investigation is able to establish the relevant facts, we will not be able to respond meaningfully to the three questions posed,” Acting Assistant Inspector General Larry Turner responded to Mr. Kirk in a letter late last month. In that letter, the Inspector General’s office notified Mr. Kirk that it has “initiated an investigation into the public revelations concerning Anham FZCO’s alleged use of Iranian ports to supply U.S. forces in Afghanistan.” Anham executives also said Monday that the company’s chief executive officer, A. Huda Farouki, will step away from the day-to-day management of Anham in January, but will continue as the company’s board chairman and oversee an executive committee. Mr. Farouki will be succeeded by Jay Ward, who has served for the past year as Anham’s chief operating officer.

Media Sources validating the above story:


http://www.cfr.org/about/newsletters/archive/newsletter/n1626




Monday, October 28, 2013



Sens. Push DOD To Probe ANHAM FZCO's Iran Connections


Media Source: October 28, 2013---Law360, New York -- Two Republican senators are pressing the U.S. Department of Defense watchdog to find out whether Anham FZCO LLC, a Dubai-based logistics company and U.S. contractor, shipped items through a port in Iran in order to fulfill a contract.

Sens. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H., and Mark Kirk, R-Ill., wrote a letter to DOD Inspector General Jon T. Rymer on Tuesday, expressing their concern over reports that Anham had knowingly used Iranian ports to deliver supplies used to build a warehouse in Afghanistan for the DOD.

Anham, a longtime U.S. government contractor, has received numerous contracts to provide infrastructure support, security services, and food and water to Department of Defense customers in Afghanistan.

On Sept. 26, The Wall Street Journal reported that the company had used Iran's Bandar Abbas seaport in 2012 to land materials that were then transported across Iran to Afghanistan to build the warehouse, putting it at an advantage to win another supply contract with the Pentagon. The Journal's article prompted a spike in public interest in Anham's possible connections to Iran.

"We request that you urgently look into this matter, verify the recent public reports surrounding Anham, make recommendations on what to do with Anham's existing U.S. government contracts and propose steps to the department should take to ensure this does not happen again," the senators said in their letter to Rymer.

Bandar Abbas, Iran's main container terminal, manages over 90 percent of Iran's container operations, according to a U.S. Department of the Treasury fact sheet.

In 2011, the Office of Foreign Assets Control designated Tidewater Middle East Co., the company that manages the port of Bandar Abbas, as being owned by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps.

According to the Treasury, the corps continues to be a focus of U.S. and international concern "because of the central part it plays in Iran's illicit conduct." Iran has repeatedly used Tidewater-managed ports to ship arms in violation of U.N. Security Council resolutions.

Ayotte and Kirk told Rymer that Anham executives knew that were materials were being shipped through Iran before it voluntarily disclosed them to the U.S. departments of Defense, Commerce and Treasury in September.

They asked Rymer if it would be possible to terminate Anham's contracts with the DOD, whether Task Force 2010 or U.S. Central Command had recommended any action be taken against Anham, and what actions, if any, the DOD plans to take against the contractor.

A spokeswoman for the Inspector General told Law360 on Friday that the office had received the letter and is currently reviewing the matter.

--Editing by Katherine Rautenberg.